- Being One Of Millions Of Surfers Throughout The Internet, I See That

- Being one of millions of surfers throughout the Internet, I see that fundamental civil liberties areas important in cyberspace as they are in traditional contexts. Cyberspace defined in Webster'sTenth Edition dictionary is the on-line worlds of networks. The right to speak and publishusing a virtual pen has its roots in a long tradition dating back to the very founding of democracyin this country. With the passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, Congress has preparedto turn the Internet from one of the greatest resources of cultural, social, and scientificinformation into the online equivalent of a children's reading room. By invoking the overboardand vague term "indecent" as the standard by which electronic communication should becensored, Congress has insured that information providers seeking to avoid criminal prosecutionwill close the gates on anything but the most tame information and discussions. The Communications Decency Act calls for two years of jail time for anyone c aught using "indecent" language over the net; as if reading profanities online affects us moredramatically than reading them on paper. Our First Amendment states, "Congress shall make nolaw respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridgingthe freedom of speech, or of the press...." The Act takes away this right. TheConstitution-defying traitors creating these useless laws do not they understand the mediumthey're trying to control. What they "claim" is that they are trying to protect our children from moral threatening content. This "protect our helpless children" ideology is bogus. If more government officialswere more knowledgeable about online information they would realize the huge flaw theCommunication Decency Act contains. We don't need the government to patrol fruitlessly onthe Internet when parents can simply install software like Net Nanny or Surf Watch. These programs block all "sensitive" material from entering one's modem line . What's more,legislators have already passed effective laws against obscenity and child pornography. Wedon't need a redundant Act to accomplish what has already been written. Over 17 million Web pages float throughout cyberspace. Never before has informationbeen so instant, and so global. And never before has our government been so spooked by thepotential power "little people" have at their fingertips. The ability for anyone to send picturesand words cheaply and quickly to potentially millions of others seems to terrify the governmentand control freaks. Thus, the Communications Decency Act destroys our own constitution rightsand insults the dreams of Jefferson, Washington, Madison, Mill, Brandeis, and DeToqueville. It's funny, now that we finally have a medium that truly allows us to exercise our FirstAmendment right, the government is trying to censor it. Forget them! Continue to engage infree speech on the net. It's the only way to win the battle.

Resistance in The Bluest Eye and essays

Resistance in The Bluest Eye and essays It has been said that historically, black women have been absent from much feminist theory, both in feminist literature and black literature. (Watkins, pp165) Two writers that are working to change this HIStory, are Toni Morrison and Melissa Lucashenko. These writers are both black and are both female. They write to include the other. That is, they empower the previously marginalised black woman. We will look into how this is achieved further on in the article. In short, this article discusses how the characters of Morrisons, The Bluest Eye, and Lucashenkos Steam Pigs are marginalised and disempowered by the totalising structures of race, gender and class. It then continues to critique the ways in which the characters resist to such forces. Firstly, it must be said that although The Bluest Eye is set in America in the 1940s and is written by an American author, and Steam Pigs is placed in Australia in the late 1990s and is by an Australian author, there are many themes found within the two texts that are universal and timeless. The first being issues of race. In The Bluest Eye, Morrison identifies racism on two levels. Firstly white to black racism, but more importantly black to black racism. In the first instance Morrison uses the very few white characters in the novel, the little white child that Pauline Breedlove cares for, to establish a difference in race. The family has affectionately called Pauline Polly (Morrison pp. 127). This action has very white middle-class undertones and almost implies that her identity as a strong Afro-American woman no longer exists in their world. She is simply their housemaid, no matter how much they adore her. Another example of white to black racism is in the metaphor of the Shirley Temple cup and the chocolate wrappers with the blued-eyed white girl. While this i...

Property law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Property law - Assignment Example One of the interesting aspects about this problem is that the nature of obligation changed from one tenant to the next. The facts indicate that my client is the tenant of a Victorian Townhouse. The facts also indicate that my client is not the original tenant, and that the lease was assigned to my client three years ago. It may be inferred that perhaps the previous client, the one who actually made the original lease with the landlord, was a residential lessee, as the structure is a home, and the character of the lease changed when the original lessee assigned his or her lease to the current lessor, who is obviously a business lessee, as they are using the space for a bookstore. Therefore, two different parts of the Landlord Tenant Act might apply in this situation. The original lessee, if the original lessee was a residential lessee, would fall under the first part of this Act, and the current lessee, who is a business, would fall under the second part of the Act. This is because th e first part of the Act is titled â€Å"Security of Tenure for Residential Tenants,† and the provisions in this part apply only to residential tenants. The second part of the Act is titled â€Å"Security of Tenure for Business, Professional and Other Tenants,† and it, of course, applies to commercial interests, such as the one in the fact pattern. Therefore, two different analysis will have to be performed – one analysis for the original tenant, and one for the current tenant, who is our client. The fact pattern indicates that, for the original lessee, the original lease was executed in 1997 and included a repair covenant, in which the original lessee was to perform the necessary repair work to keep the building in tenantable condition, and that this included decorations, wall-surfaces, window frames, glazing and casements. Moreover, in the original lease, there was provision for rent review in the 5th, 10th and 15th years of the lease and that the lease may ter minate on the 16th year, by giving six months notice, provided that the lessee materially performed the duties that were required of that tenant under this lease. Therefore, the clause that the original lessee signed with the landlord will come under the Landlord Tenant Act 1954  § 8. This provision states that when a tenant and landlord agree that the tenant is to perform certain repairs on the structure, and these repairs are not made, then the landlord may charge the tenant the reasonable value of the repairs (Landlord Tenant Act 1954  § 8). This does not seem like an overly draconian solution to the problem, if it is determined that there needs to be repairs made and the tenant refuses to make the repairs - the landlord can simply make the necessary repairs himself, which in this case would include shoring up the cracks in the ceiling, and reinforcing the floor joists so that the excess load does not cause further cracks, and could then charge the lessee the necessary charge s that the landlord would incur in getting this done. Yet there is a more draconian provision in the Landlord Tenant Act 1954 when it comes to lessees who refuse to perform the terms of the lease. In this case, the terms of the lease are that the lessee performs the repair work that ensures that the dwelling in tenantable, and, assuming that having cracks in the ceiling make the dwelling untenantable, then a refusal to deal with this issue might be cause for